As I’m
preparing to lead my children in a 20th Century history course, I’ve
been compiling lists of books to read, Netflix and YouTube videos, Pinterest
projects and the like. I came upon a
book called, The War that Saved My Life, by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley, a
2016 Newberry Honor Book, displayed at my local library. I perused it quickly and stuck it in my bag
to pre-read for the school year. While the storyline was really quite
spellbinding, I want to share with you some of my troubling thoughts concerning
the book as a whole.
Ada, a pre-teen girl, is telling her story of how she was a London Evacuee during the German Blitz of World War II. Born with a club foot, she lived with her mother and younger brother in a flat near the docks. She couldn’t walk, was responsible for cleaning the home and caring for Jamie, her 6 year old brother. She had never been allowed out of her tiny home, as her mother despised Ada for her condition and it is later revealed that all the neighbors have been told Ada is “simple minded.” Living under great verbal, physical and mental abuse, as well as negligence, she decides to escape with her brother with a group of evacuees heading out of the city for safety.
Along
the way, she discovers just how negligent her mother, and as a result of their
utter filth and poverty, had to be forced upon a single woman to take her and
her brother in for the duration of the evacuation. Susan, the woman who would now care for the
two children, eventually did a commendable job, not only caring for their
physical needs, but providing love, kindness and nurturing such as they had
never experienced before.
That
much of the story was captivating, sharing not only a glimpse of the historical
drama, but sharing a girl filled with so much pain, that escaping her mother
and the city because of the bomb threat actually benefited her immensely. Now let’s talk about Susan. Bits of information about her past seep out
through the telling of her story. She is
depressed about the somewhat recent passing of her friend, Becky, who lived
with her. Becky owned prize horses that
she used for hunting, but had been sold off, providing Susan with living
money. Susan was outcast from the city,
having few friends. She was disowned by
her Preacher Father, because of what she learned at Oxford. Susan’s birthday represented an especially hard
day. I wondered right off if Susan was a Lesbian, but thankfully the book never
became any more graphic about the relationship than the statements listed
here. However, I believe any discerning
reader would gather the same conclusion I had, since the target audience of
this book is pre-teens, that is unacceptable! The reader is lead to believe
that just as Ada cannot be responsible for her club foot, and her brother Jamie
was born being left handed, so was Susan born with her “condition”.
Now,
maybe this isn’t a big deal to you.
Maybe this is something worth discussing with your children. I’ve discussed homosexuality and the culture
with my own tween daughters. But first, you
need to know the author’s stance behind this and the feminism driving this
force right at our children. Bradley, the author, admits that Susan is gay and
thinks it’s humorous that parents might have a problem with this, because
children certainly don’t. She asserts
the obviousness of Susan’s sexuality as well as confessing the whole situation of
lesbian lovers living together in the countryside isn’t historically accurate. Bradley declares on her blog: “The
fight for gay rights may not be over, but the war has been won. We're past the
tipping point. Equality has prevailed; all that's left now is tamping out the
brush fires and skirmishes.” She claims that children see expressions of
gay love all the time at school and throughout public life, which pleases her
greatly that it’s too common to be worth noticing. A commenter on her blog is
so tickled that children reading this will able to see Susan’s reflection of
such a loving relationship, that it is an invaluable tool for children to
recognize and accept this. This woman is apparently a 6th grade
teacher, quite excited to teach this book to her students, perhaps in a
classroom near you.
In another post,
Bradley’s main goal is to “write books that tell the truth”, and to represent
the gay and transgender, as well as the non-white and disabled peoples. After
all, aren’t they on the same level of morality and inability to choose who they
are and how they are born? She asserts that it is “a disservice to our
children, who need books that reflect their reality”. My reality and my Truth
is a far cry from this lady’s.
CNN acknowledges the Common Core standards get credit for
making history books popular. Do you
suppose that with historical books written for children becoming so popular,
more authors are writing these kinds of books?
In a democracy, supply and demand is the breadwinner, and it is not too
far-fetched to think that authors, knowing there are willing readers and
willing Common Core classrooms, to write in such a way to further one’s own
agenda? Obviously, writing to an agenda is nothing new, but with public schools
backing books such as these and libraries and publishers praising in raving
reviews and numerous awards given, there will be no end to books being written
that deserve a Christian critique.
3 comments:
Oh brother. Your poor home schooled children. Another ignorant “Jesus lover”
I'm a proponent of parents reading what their kids read, so thank you for doing that. As a longtime teacher, I have a different perspective on Miss Smith as a lesbian. Whether they align with your beliefs or not, GLBTQ people are in the world. They existed in England in the 1940s. Gay people are not recent nor are they invisible, and if we leave them out of kids' books, we are offering children a distorted view of the world *that erases some of them, and their families, from it.* That's no more acceptable to me than declaring that we shouldn't have well-rounded, non-stereotypical portrayals of people of faith in kids' books -- we absolutely should, because they are in the world and because they reflect some readers and their families. I don't see that as any kind of "feminist agenda" -- I see that as respecting my students and not making assumptions about their families or their identities. In other words, doing unto others. : )
I'm not the author of this post, but I am a proud Jesus lover. That does not make me poor or ignorant. You, Manatees, who think that Jesus lovers are ignorant and that homeschooled children are poor (when they could make so much more money sending their kids to public school and working outside the home) is the mistaken one.
Post a Comment